Group Structure

     Within my core group of friends each of us have certain roles we fulfill, although we are not trapped in these set roles. I am describing my core group as : Matt, Spencer, Anna, Jorge, Zach, and Blake, and myself. 
     Task Roles     
Matt - Generally Matt takes on the task role of the "information seeker". Whenever an idea is  proposed Matt is usually the one to figure out the details of how it is going to work out. Matt also often acts as the "orienter" keeping the group on task and steering us back on course when we get side tracked.
Spencer - Spencer usually fills the "information giver" role; he is very good at relating personal  experiences and is a wealth of knowledge on a plethora of subjects.
Anna - It is hard to narrow Anna to just one roll because she contributes so many aspects to the group. Most often she is the "elaborator" and/ or the "initiator". She often proposes ideas of things for us to do as well as elaborating on others' plans.
Jorge - Jorge is most often the "engergizer"; his enthusiasm is contagious and he often drives the group into action.
Zach - The "evaluator" is the position that best describes Zach. He looks at things in an analytical way and determines the possibility that the plan will work out. Zach also often fills the position of the "procedural technician", deciding where events are to take place and what will all be required.
Blake - Much the same as Zach, Blake often acts as the "evaluator", but he also fills the roles of "opinion giver" and "information seeker". He proposes ideas of what the group should do and also seeks out information.
Myself - I most often find myself in the role of "procedural technician", I figure out the logistics of most events we coordinate. I also act as the "opinion seeker" to be sure that everyone is okay with the plans we make.
    Personal Roles     
Matt - Matt is often a "compromiser" in his personal role. He is a pretty easy-going guy and doesn't mind if things don't go exactly his way.
Spencer - Spencer is also easy-going and acts as a "compromiser".
Anna - "gatekeeper" is a role that Anna often contributes to our group. She makes a point that everyone has a say in what goes on.
Jorge - Jorge is the "encourager" of our group.
Zach - Zach is a good "harmonizer" he often defuses stressful situations with his wit.
Blake - Blake is also very good at being the "harmonizer" in almost any situation. He is always trying to cheer people up and bring people together.
Myself - I tend to be a "compromiser" and a "harmonizer" because I am easy going and when people fight I feel very anxious and uncomfortable.

 Our group never faces much conflict, as we are all pretty easy going, flexible people. There is never really one leader; that role tends to change with every situation. Matt, Anna, Blake, and Zach generally step up to lead most situations. On occasion, if an event is happening at my house or has personal interest tied to me, I will lead the group. We all tend to lead with a democratic, and rarely authoritarian, style.
I don't at all mind the roles in the group that I fill. None of us were forced into any role or feel we need to be someone we aren't for the sake of the group, all of our roles are based on our individual personalities. We harmonize because we all have similar interests and a diverse range of personalities to fill several different roles. We use each others' strengths and cover each others' weaknesses so that we remain one solid circle of friends.
 :) BFFs 4 EVR